May 21, 2012, 08:56:34 PM

DeWALT Owners Group « GENERAL DISCUSSIONS « A LOOK INSIDE POWER TOOLS « DEWALT DC827 IMPACT DRIVER vs MAKITA BTD142 IMPACT DRIVER
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: DEWALT DC827 IMPACT DRIVER vs MAKITA BTD142 IMPACT DRIVER  (Read 6204 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
D.O.G-
Administrator
BLEEDS YELLOW!
*****
Karma: +21/-0
Posts: 1136
Offline Offline
WWW
« on: June 02, 2009, 08:06:09 PM »

DEWALT DC827 IMPACT DRIVER vs MAKITA BTD142 IMPACT DRIVER!









































































<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/5lg2TMO132c&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;rel=0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/5lg2TMO132c&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;rel=0</a>


<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/cAbXhvuvclk&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;rel=0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/cAbXhvuvclk&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;rel=0</a>










« Last Edit: June 04, 2009, 03:40:27 PM by JC » Logged

Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.
nailbanger
Guest
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2009, 08:48:29 PM »

How about a lag bolt driving contest?  Get some 5/16 or 3/8 lags with washers so you don't bury the bolt head.
Logged
D.O.G-
Administrator
BLEEDS YELLOW!
*****
Karma: +21/-0
Posts: 1136
Offline Offline
WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2009, 08:54:57 PM »

As in a speed test? Or how many can be driven?
Logged

Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Posts: 2
Offline Offline
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2009, 09:55:23 PM »

darn it, this is the one i want to see. Just do your normal lag test.....number driven, and speed. My 827 comes in the mail Thursday or Friday, can not wait. But try to get it up quick, hehe I want to see this, I hope the Dewalt wins
Logged
D.O.G-
Administrator
BLEEDS YELLOW!
*****
Karma: +21/-0
Posts: 1136
Offline Offline
WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2009, 10:05:06 PM »

I'll get it up tomorrow night.

This is also my new DC827, the third one in my collection. I just noticed that the switch has been upgraded in my new one vs my old one.


http://www.dewaltownersgroup.com/pics/DC8272.jpg

http://www.dewaltownersgroup.com/pics/MakitaBTD142_3.jpg
Logged

Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Posts: 12
Offline Offline
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2009, 11:14:57 PM »

Yeah I would have to agree on the lag bolt test
Logged
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Posts: 1
Offline Offline
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2009, 10:11:23 AM »

How about some testing of durability and longevity.  I have been purchasing DeWalt hammer drills for an industrial maintenance department, and am very disappointed in the clutch/torque adjustment durability, compared to other brands.  Undecided
Logged
D.O.G-
Administrator
BLEEDS YELLOW!
*****
Karma: +21/-0
Posts: 1136
Offline Offline
WWW
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2009, 10:20:27 AM »

That's a tough one to do on a forum.... All you can really go by are people's honest opinions and experience. I can tell you that the DCD950's clutch, and hammer components are far more durable and better built than the DC988, DC927, and the DC925.
Logged

Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Posts: 2
Offline Offline
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2009, 06:10:03 PM »

Hehe well that sucks. Got a 927 coming with my 827(Course i do window installation, really only need it for its hammer "powers". Impact driver though, gets used a poop ton. going from a Ryobi(regular bat)(850 lbs?) to the 827 (1330?)  hey, one day for poops and giggles can you VS those two? hehe
« Last Edit: June 03, 2009, 09:23:07 PM by JC » Logged
D.O.G-
Administrator
BLEEDS YELLOW!
*****
Karma: +21/-0
Posts: 1136
Offline Offline
WWW
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2009, 08:40:55 PM »

Well I won't get that video posted tonight.... I forgot I toasted both Makita batteries!@ So I've got to buy another battery to do the impact test! Grin
Logged

Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.
D.O.G-
Administrator
BLEEDS YELLOW!
*****
Karma: +21/-0
Posts: 1136
Offline Offline
WWW
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2009, 04:09:32 PM »

Ok I've added in a few Video tests.
Logged

Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Posts: 12
Offline Offline
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2009, 02:42:00 PM »

cool JC.  How about a test that include the number of lags they can each can drive on a charge?
Logged
D.O.G-
Administrator
BLEEDS YELLOW!
*****
Karma: +21/-0
Posts: 1136
Offline Offline
WWW
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2009, 03:49:52 PM »

I've put one together, but youtube won't allow video's over 10 minutes. So I'll have to shrink the video down.
Logged

Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Posts: 6
Offline Offline
« Reply #13 on: June 11, 2009, 01:07:07 PM »

I think the Dewalt should easily beat the Makita since the Mak battery is a small 1.5ah. The full size 3.0ah batteries should be a closer match. In that case the Makita might beat the Dewalt. I also have both of these units, only My Makita is the BTD140 which is otherwise the same tool but with the blue clamshell. I got virtually identical results in the speed tests. The Dewalt is definately faster by a little. Nevertheless I find myself using the Makita more simply because I can use small batteries, it's a fair bit lighter and the LED staying on without holding the trigger is a lot more convinient when aligning bits in dark areas. I really wish dewalt would make a compact lithium battery and have the led stay on.
Logged
D.O.G-
Administrator
BLEEDS YELLOW!
*****
Karma: +21/-0
Posts: 1136
Offline Offline
WWW
« Reply #14 on: June 11, 2009, 04:51:12 PM »

The larger 3.0 makita battery only increases weight and runtime. A larger Ah battery does not increase power. 18v is 18v. Unless you meant trying the BTD141 (140) instead of the BTD142. The Dewalt DC827 has 1330 in lbs of torque, and the BTD141 has 1330 in lbs of torque as well. The BTD142 has 1280 in lbs of torque. But remember that the Ridgid R86030 had 1400 in lbs of torque, and the Dewalt DC827 still outperformed it. That being said, the Dewalt DC827 vs the Makita BTD142 was pretty close, which leaves me to believe that the BTD141 vs the DC827 would be nearly neck to neck. I've got a BTD142 coming in the mail, and I will be posting up some results in the near future.

As far as weight goes, the difference between the Dewalt DC827 and the Makita BTD142 is 2oz. That is using the Dewalt DC9180 XRP lithium Ion battery, and the Makita 3.0 battery. The 1.5 Makita battery does not fit on any other Makita tool, unless it's white.
Logged

Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Cargo design by DzinerStudio | Edited by cartpauj Professional Web Design
Unique Hits: 1835431