I am a frequent reader of most RC forums, and am familiar with this article. Most full sized batteries from most power-tool manufactures typically run for nearly a half hour before the battery runs out. I believe that's more than enough time to properly seat the brushes.
Yes but I am specifically talking about can-motors here. Non-can motors (with brushes) need to be seated in too but the process to set in those is not the same for can motors. E.g. in the last picture I provided, the non-can motor still is not making “full” contact on the commutator, because the surface of the brush is rippled. so, even making a review on that motor brand new won't be the same as when the brushes "settle in."
The difference were talking about is minuscule, these fractions of performance matter a whole lot more in the RC world than in the power-tool world.
Why is that? thanks.
90% of all end-users wouldn't have a clue what your talking about, and for those who do would certainly argue it's relevance. The difference may be 1-2 holes, if that. You can run 5 controlled tests and get a 5 different results each time.
Yes I understand your reasoning, but I would like to see it in writing baked up with evidence. E.g. like a video. I am just one of those 10% who is not satisfied that’s all.
