next »

[Aprelia]

So far I've taken apart pretty much anything except new 20v Max stuff.

I suspect either 5s2p config with Sony VT or Sanyo or Samsung Q series. I've talked to a UK distributor and he stated the cells are not A123 for sure. That's a major turnoff for me. It seems dewalt is trying to get competitive with Makita by cheapening the batteries. I can appreciate that, I've been selling tools for a while and most people could not care less about max discharge current or cycle life, they just want cheap batteries, no matter how bad they are. A123 is far, far superior to anything on the market today and we don't have anything new coming for a while, except maybe tools based on ultracapacitors.

I won't be surprised is Makita or Hilti flips on Dewalt and starts using A123 in something like 5s3p configuration, making 3.3Ah batteries with 200A+ discharge rates, creating monster torque tools.

So, that being said, anyone from UK care to open up the 20v max battery?

[kjones]

You are correct in that it is not an A123 battery.  The current 18v batteries are still going to be offered for the foreseeable future (as long as there is still a market for them), and the 20v platform will be an additional line.  I can't talk about price point until it is officially launched, but you are correct so far on the battery systems. 

The point is that the 20 volt system is not replacing the current 18 volt system, but rather adding another option for people who whose needs where not satisfied by the existing lines.  This is honestly a great solution, because now all sides can be satisfied.

[DEWALTDUDE]

This should answer some of your questions regarding Stanley Black&Decker's standing relationship with A123.

HERE.

[Aprelia]

The point is that the 20 volt system is not replacing the current 18 volt system, but rather adding another option for people who whose needs where not satisfied by the existing lines.  This is honestly a great solution, because now all sides can be satisfied.

Sorry, you sound like a corporate drone saying that. The only problem with pod batteries was fatter tool handles, they didn't have to switch to Sony cells. There is no sides and never was, contractors still use pod style Makita tools that have much fatter handle and no one cares. There is nothing DC411 or DC380 with a slider battery can do that a pod-style can't.

This was done to make batteries cheaper and nothing else. They missed the train by not educating user base on nanophosphate benefits. They could have exposed Milwaukee/Makita for promising 2000 cycles on manganese cells which is a blatant lie. Users win NOTHING with 3Ah battery that can only produce ~40A max, because when you drain it at high rate, the discharge becomes non-linear and in the end it will die FASTER than 2.3Ah A123-based battery - wait and see.

Some marketing genius decided to cheapen the tool to compete and the end result is crap batteries, and "20V" marking confirms this. In fact, phosphate batteries are 3.6v and not 4.2v nominal, so 5x3.6 = 18. So if they call the tools 20v (hint that they are 4.2v Manganese or Cobalt cells) and 1.5Ah cells, then I think they won't even be based on Sony US18650SF/F cells and instead use red Sanyo cells or worse - Sony 18650VT cells which Makita/Bosch uses and which are absolute garbage.

The other reason they released the "20v max" is to save 2 dollars on a mosfet and microcontroller that's in the pod battery stem.

I'm very disappointed with this decision and hope the 20v line turns out a huge fail like 24v Nicd and 28v LiFePO4 line was. They could have easily made adapters for older tools (it's very easy to make one, 5 bucks in components + mold) from slider to pod, and the fact that they didn't is proof that pod style is a dead end now and believing otherwise is just childish and irresponsible.

Milwaukee went thru 3 generations of cells and each step was an improvement, while Dewalt made a huge step back.

A123 makes prismatic cells and could have easily produced 3Ah pack that fits in a slider pack (and it would be a lot lighter than cylindrical-based packs) but Dewalt instead cheapened the tools. I'm also sure there will be a swift return to crappy Jacobs 500/700 series chucks too. Rohm chucks are ~$45 cost to them and just looking at $299 pricepoints, I have a feeling they will cheapen the chucks. The final nail in the coffin for me would be if they ditch Xenoy and go for nylon. I have yet to see what triggers and chuck collars are made out of of in new tools.

/rand mode off

[Madtec]

It is easy to criticize without being technically informed, but then again, who's to say your not on a phishing expedition.....

And I am far from a corporate drone.....

[kjones]

The point is that the 20 volt system is not replacing the current 18 volt system, but rather adding another option for people who whose needs where not satisfied by the existing lines.  This is honestly a great solution, because now all sides can be satisfied.

Sorry, you sound like a corporate drone saying that. The only problem with pod batteries was fatter tool handles, they didn't have to switch to Sony cells. There is no sides and never was, contractors still use pod style Makita tools that have much fatter handle and no one cares. There is nothing DC411 or DC380 with a slider battery can do that a pod-style can't.

This was done to make batteries cheaper and nothing else. They missed the train by not educating user base on nanophosphate benefits. They could have exposed Milwaukee/Makita for promising 2000 cycles on manganese cells which is a blatant lie. Users win NOTHING with 3Ah battery that can only produce ~40A max, because when you drain it at high rate, the discharge becomes non-linear and in the end it will die FASTER than 2.3Ah A123-based battery - wait and see.

Some marketing genius decided to cheapen the tool to compete and the end result is crap batteries, and "20V" marking confirms this. In fact, phosphate batteries are 3.6v and not 4.2v nominal, so 5x3.6 = 18. So if they call the tools 20v (hint that they are 4.2v Manganese or Cobalt cells) and 1.5Ah cells, then I think they won't even be based on Sony US18650SF/F cells and instead use red Sanyo cells or worse - Sony 18650VT cells which Makita/Bosch uses and which are absolute garbage.

The other reason they released the "20v max" is to save 2 dollars on a mosfet and microcontroller that's in the pod battery stem.

I'm very disappointed with this decision and hope the 20v line turns out a huge fail like 24v Nicd and 28v LiFePO4 line was. They could have easily made adapters for older tools (it's very easy to make one, 5 bucks in components + mold) from slider to pod, and the fact that they didn't is proof that pod style is a dead end now and believing otherwise is just childish and irresponsible.

Milwaukee went thru 3 generations of cells and each step was an improvement, while Dewalt made a huge step back.

A123 makes prismatic cells and could have easily produced 3Ah pack that fits in a slider pack (and it would be a lot lighter than cylindrical-based packs) but Dewalt instead cheapened the tools. I'm also sure there will be a swift return to crappy Jacobs 500/700 series chucks too. Rohm chucks are ~$45 cost to them and just looking at $299 pricepoints, I have a feeling they will cheapen the chucks. The final nail in the coffin for me would be if they ditch Xenoy and go for nylon. I have yet to see what triggers and chuck collars are made out of of in new tools.

/rand mode off

You are completely missing the point here.  You obviously know about battery chemistries, but you have a clear and complete misunderstanding of MARKET WIDE trends.  While in your opinion a pod style battery works great (I agree with you, and will continue to use my 18v tools), there is a segment of the cordless tool market  (20 to 30% in the US) that prefer the ergonomics available through a slide pack.  Whether you choose to believe the truth that 18v is here to stay, and that 20v slide pack is an ADDITIONAL option or not does not really matter to me, but do not try to propagate your misinformation if you do not care to learn the facts first.  DeWALT is not abandoning the 18v line, they are not going to stop investing in it, and they are not going to do anything else to slow it's growth so long as it is still a seller.  the 20v line is quite simply a new option to go after those who do not like the current DeWALT style. 

You are correct that the A123 battery is an excellent chemistry, and it is still used in some of the batteries (36v for example), but there is nothing wrong with the Sony battery either.  Look market wide and try to sell a customer a battery that costs significantly more (A123 vs. Sony), with few benefits.  The Sony cell that is used in the DeWALT batteries is still the best on the market, and the cycle life will last longer than anyone else (as you already pointed out, which is due in large part to amp hour). 

The 20v actually has a more expensive electronics package in it, it is just moved to the trigger, where it is able to monitor more of the entire tool rather than only the battery (again, going after the users in the market who prefer this type of control), so it has nothing to do with overall cost of production.  The 20v will use a mix of the Jacobs and Rohm chucks, same as the current 18v line.  Now if you want to say that the 20v line doesn't sound like it is "for you", than that is completely understandable, so you can stick with the 18v line.  The 20v is just another option that appeals to a different segment of the market.

[Aprelia]

You clearly did not understand what I said. I said, that the BAD thing about pod style pack is a resulting fat handle. I totally agree that slide pack is much better and there is a market for it. What I don't agree with is the choice of cells. I've been selling and researching tools for years, I'm in constant contact with local Makita, Dewalt and Milwaukee service centers and many, many suppliers. I had many tools in my possession long before they were announced ANYWHERE. I had every single tool Makita and Dewalt ever made for 18v. I still have a 18v biscuit jointer that's a huge rarity now. I still own full 36v line. I know PRECISELY what's happening on the market. I know EXACTLY how much the electronics cost and what they actually do (I'm an electronics tech), please do not insult my intelligence. I did in-depth tool reviews long, long before this forum even existed (ask the owner). I played with Senco fusion guns months before any online magazine wrote about them, go to youtube and look up FN55AX - I posted a video months before it was available anywhere.

Now let's look at some prices.

First of all, costs:
A123 cell - $6-$8
Sony LiFePO4 - $5-6
Sanyo or Sony KONION $3-5/cell.

Microcontroller, passive components and mosfet are $7-8 MAX. That means moving them to the handle saves approx 7% of battery cost. If you think the micro inside the battery does some extremely complex computation you are wrong. It's very primitive. The "monitoring" you hear about is a charge cycle counter that writes to EEPROM, a thermistor and *maybe* a current sensor, and a cell balancer. There is absolutely nothing magic about old or new BMS. In fact, phosphate batteries are more picky than cobalt/manganese cells, they need more complex circuitry. Some Sony and Samsung cells are self-balancing, which cheapens the BMS a lot.

As you already know, new 20v max are NOT iron phosphate. That means that they will automatically be 600-800 cycle cells (regardless who makes them). A123 can produce 70A/cell, Sony iron phosphate can produce 20A/cell, regular Sonys or red Sanyo can only do 20A or less.

So, by pretty much halving the battery costs, we have:
1. Less than HALF the cycle life.
2. 60% less power produced by the battery - more stalls.
3. 30% less shelf life due to chemistry.
4. Internal resistance increase with age (iron phosphate - opposite) - lower torque with battery age.
5. Poor performance in extreme hot weather.
6. Reduced safety (yep, those LiCo/LiMn cells burn like Heck if damaged)
7. 40% capacity increase (yet to be seen in action).

My point is, Dewalt didn't just make a new line to fill a market niche. They deliberately lowered battery quality (and price) to better compete with others. I think that the whole "MAX" thing is wankery, I hear all kinds of theories why the new line wasn't left as "18v" but it's all bull, they call it 18v in EU and nobody died. They could have stayed with A123 or *at least* LiFePO4 Sony cells and moved BMS into the tool handle, but instead they chose crappy cells. They could have came up with prismatic cells or even 3.3Ah in 5s3p configuration but no, it all came down to bottom line.

PS: Just a clarification: Yes, Sony LiFePO4 batteries are best on the market but they will *not* be used in 20v MAX line. Compared to them, any other brand cells are complete crap when it comes to specs, even Sanyos or Samsung INR Q series.

[Aprelia]

It is easy to criticize without being technically informed, but then again, who's to say your not on a phishing expedition.....

And I am far from a corporate drone.....

Me, not being "technically informed"? Hahaha. Please read my blog here, then come back http://toolhacker.com/2010/01/bosch-dewalt-makita-milwaukee-ryobi-ridgid-hilti-battery-specs/

I also never called you a corporate drone, I addressed kjones. I don't think you know what "phishing" means. My other account on this forum is Wartex and I've been a member from pretty much day one on this forum, and started tool reviews long before this forum existed. Ask JC/Paul whatever his name is.

[kjones]

I think that you still misunderstand me, as well as the point of the 20v. line.  I will not waste any more time arguing with you, as this is obviously a pointless discussion because you have your mind made up.  I never questioned your knowledge of battery/tech understanding (in fact I pointed out that you obviously knew your stuff).  What I am talking about is that you don't get that the 20v is going after the niche that the other competitors on the market have (Milwaukee and Makita mostly), including price point.  

So I am going to stop writing on this topic.  I once again want to say that I am not questioning your intelligence, just that you are making broad claims based on your personal feelings, instead of looking at the market as a whole, what each niche is looking for, and which of those are big enough to go after.

As far as the "20v" name, I don't really have an opinion.  I know why we are told that we went with the 20v name, and from what I have seen in the field with users freaking out about another 18v platform, I understand why they would call it 20v.  If there are other reasons, I don't really know or care, because what does it really matter?

First of all, costs:
A123 cell - $6-$8
Sony LiFePO4 - $5-6
Sanyo or Sony KONION $3-5/cell.

Microcontroller, passive components and mosfet are $7-8 MAX. That means moving them to the handle saves approx 7% of battery cost. If you think the micro inside the battery does some extremely complex computation you are wrong. It's very primitive. The "monitoring" you hear about is a charge cycle counter that writes to EEPROM, a thermistor and *maybe* a current sensor, and a cell balancer. There is absolutely nothing magic about old or new BMS. In fact, phosphate batteries are more picky than cobalt/manganese cells, they need more complex circuitry. Some Sony and Samsung cells are self-balancing, which cheapens the BMS a lot.

As you already know, new 20v max are NOT iron phosphate. That means that they will automatically be 600-800 cycle cells (regardless who makes them). A123 can produce 70A/cell, Sony iron phosphate can produce 20A/cell, regular Sonys or red Sanyo can only do 20A or less.

So, by pretty much halving the battery costs, we have:
1. Less than HALF the cycle life.
2. 60% less power produced by the battery - more stalls.
3. 30% less shelf life due to chemistry.
4. Internal resistance increase with age (iron phosphate - opposite) - lower torque with battery age.
5. Poor performance in extreme hot weather.
6. Reduced safety (yep, those LiCo/LiMn cells burn like Heck if damaged)
7. 40% capacity increase (yet to be seen in action).

My point is, Dewalt didn't just make a new line to fill a market niche. They deliberately lowered battery quality (and price) to better compete with others. I think that the whole "MAX" thing is wankery, I hear all kinds of theories why the new line wasn't left as "18v" but it's all bull, they call it 18v in EU and nobody died. They could have stayed with A123 or *at least* LiFePO4 Sony cells and moved BMS into the tool handle, but instead they chose crappy cells. They could have came up with prismatic cells or even 3.3Ah in 5s3p configuration but no, it all came down to bottom line.

PS: Just a clarification: Yes, Sony LiFePO4 batteries are best on the market but they will *not* be used in 20v MAX line. Compared to them, any other brand cells are complete crap when it comes to specs, even Sanyos or Samsung INR Q series.

[/quote]

[Madtec]

You clearly did not understand what I said. I said, that the BAD thing about pod style pack is a resulting fat handle. I totally agree that slide pack is much better and there is a market for it. What I don't agree with is the choice of cells. I've been selling and researching tools for years, I'm in constant contact with local Makita, Dewalt and Milwaukee service centers and many, many suppliers. I had many tools in my possession long before they were announced ANYWHERE. I had every single tool Makita and Dewalt ever made for 18v. I still have a 18v biscuit jointer that's a huge rarity now. I still own full 36v line. I know PRECISELY what's happening on the market. I know EXACTLY how much the electronics cost and what they actually do (I'm an electronics tech), please do not insult my intelligence. I did in-depth tool reviews long, long before this forum even existed (ask the owner). I played with Senco fusion guns months before any online magazine wrote about them, go to youtube and look up FN55AX - I posted a video months before it was available anywhere.

Again, there is a difference in the level of information that is being thrown from one end to the other, you may have played with a lot of products way before it hits the market but if you are not involved in the initial research and development then the information is just second hand.  First of all i am not here to impress anyone on my job or what i do; clearly i am an employee so i may know a little more inside information that do not get shared with local service centers or reps and i am not about to spill any information that i feel is privileged.  That being said let's evaluate what is being said and i will try to answer any technical information that is needed.

Now let's look at some prices.

First of all, costs:
A123 cell - $6-$8
Sony LiFePO4 - $5-6
Sanyo or Sony KONION $3-5/cell.

What are these per cell price or retail?  If so, any battery would cost 3x the amount

Microcontroller, passive components and mosfet are $7-8 MAX. That means moving them to the handle saves approx 7% of battery cost. If you think the micro inside the battery does some extremely complex computation you are wrong. It's very primitive. The "monitoring" you hear about is a charge cycle counter that writes to EEPROM, a thermistor and *maybe* a current sensor, and a cell balancer. There is absolutely nothing magic about old or new BMS. In fact, phosphate batteries are more picky than cobalt/manganese cells, they need more complex circuitry. Some Sony and Samsung cells are self-balancing, which cheapens the BMS a lot.

Again, are these retail prices you are quoting?  Not even digikey, allied or any other electronics distributor sells a component for this much.  A micro controller does a lot more than you think depending on the software and or hex/source code that is programmed into it and the "monitoring" you speak off, please..... with early versions of A123 phosphate cells, balancing was critical for run time and cycle life, a cell cycle is based on a cell (i will use A123 as and example) being fully charged and discharged under a typical 10A load, so a 3.6v lithium cell can only discharge to a recommended 1.5v.  With a "micro" you can limit the amount of current and monitor the cell cycle, and internal heat so you do not go under the threshold, if you do, you risk diminishing the cycle life of the cell eg. if you drive your car low oil or coolant the engine will not last long.  Fact, makita would let the cells discharged way pass this threshold and would not shut off during high cell temp; they just recently added temperature to their tool  to "monitor" cells, so having a micro is not as primitive as you think and if so, why was the time and energy to add it in there the first place.

Also, it is cobalt oxide and manganese that is more temperamental than phosphate.  With early versions of oxide cells, they tend to run extremely hot and can cause internal short and thermal runaway, remember the big recall by milwaukee a few years back?  Phosphates are more forgiving but NiCd is still the best as far as rugged use

As you already know, new 20v max are NOT iron phosphate. That means that they will automatically be 600-800 cycle cells (regardless who makes them). A123 can produce 70A/cell, Sony iron phosphate can produce 20A/cell, regular Sonys or red Sanyo can only do 20A or less.

Unless you have done any cell level testing this is not the whole story, this 600-800 cycle life is under extreme 30-40A discharge.  The initial problem with A123 26650 cells for example, is they would self discharge at a higher rate making the cycle life even worst.

So, by pretty much halving the battery costs, we have:
1. Less than HALF the cycle life.
2. 60% less power produced by the battery - more stalls.
3. 30% less shelf life due to chemistry.
4. Internal resistance increase with age (iron phosphate - opposite) - lower torque with battery age.
5. Poor performance in extreme hot weather.
6. Reduced safety (yep, those LiCo/LiMn cells burn like Heck if damaged)
7. 40% capacity increase (yet to be seen in action).

My point is, Dewalt didn't just make a new line to fill a market niche. They deliberately lowered battery quality (and price) to better compete with others. I think that the whole "MAX" thing is wankery, I hear all kinds of theories why the new line wasn't left as "18v" but it's all bull, they call it 18v in EU and nobody died. They could have stayed with A123 or *at least* LiFePO4 Sony cells and moved BMS into the tool handle, but instead they chose crappy cells. They could have came up with prismatic cells or even 3.3Ah in 5s3p configuration but no, it all came down to bottom line.

Sorry to bust your bubble, but i have tested A123 1.3ah cells that did not make in the high power tools industry; it was great out the box but fell flat and was out performed by the Sony 1.1ah cell, so clearly your level of internal cell and testing is not up to par.  With the whole 20v Max* brand, it is just what the no load voltage is measured, in EUR, you have to market at the measured voltage under nominal load which is 18v.  Sony, Samsung and all the other cell manufactures have different grades of cells, some performs better than others, so you have a variety of what model cell and performance you desire and it's the power tool manufactures who use the cells to their advantage.  Do you think they would not spend millions of dollars on cell development just to be second rate?

PS: Just a clarification: Yes, Sony LiFePO4 batteries are best on the market but they will *not* be used in 20v MAX line. Compared to them, any other brand cells are complete crap when it comes to specs, even Sanyos or Samsung INR Q series.

First you glorify A123 and now your saying Sony is the best and the others are crap.  I think you need to do a little more research because you are clearly not suited for cell resource.  Oh and PS. Sony has a 3.0ah cell, but will it ever be suited for power tools?  Well, lets see if any primitive micro controller can handle that.

[Madtec]

It is easy to criticize without being technically informed, but then again, who's to say your not on a phishing expedition.....

And I am far from a corporate drone.....

Me, not being "technically informed"? Hahaha. Please read my blog here, then come back http://toolhacker.com/2010/01/bosch-dewalt-makita-milwaukee-ryobi-ridgid-hilti-battery-specs/

I also never called you a corporate drone, I addressed kjones. I don't think you know what "phishing" means. My other account on this forum is Wartex and I've been a member from pretty much day one on this forum, and started tool reviews long before this forum existed. Ask JC/Paul whatever his name is.

I am not going to waste my time on any opinionated articles that was copied and paste for you to call yourself and expert.......blogs are like viruses, you can get infected by one from a simple download.  First get your article published by a real magazine like Popular Mechanics and then i am all ears.

[Aprelia]

First you glorify A123 and now your saying Sony is the best and the others are crap.  I think you need to do a little more research because you are clearly not suited for cell resource.  Oh and PS. Sony has a 3.0ah cell, but will it ever be suited for power tools?  Well, lets see if any primitive micro controller can handle that.[/color]

LMAO, it's like you read only half of my post and go on blabbering your own agenda. I said Sony phosphate is 2nd best after A123, meaning the cheapest "best" alternative to manganese/cobalt. You have no posted research whatsoever, and you call me out, lol!

so a 3.6v lithium cell can only discharge to a recommended 1.5v. 

AHAHAH, the lowest acceptable voltage for cobalt/Mn is 2.4-2.8v. At 1.5 your cell will be a total brick. You clearly demonstrated you are a charlatan and HAVE NO IDEA what you are talking about. Read this before you embarass yourself even more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium-ion_battery#Prolonging_battery_pack_life

software and or hex/source code that is programmed into it

HEX code? BAHAHAHA!  It's like you are five years old and got ahold of your dad's electronics catalog. It's called "firmware", let me help you with that.

BTW the blog is all typed out by me, not copied from anywhere. Guys who are battery pros on RCgroups and endless-sphere linked to my page and copied my stuff because they found it useful.

Dude, just stop. I have a full blown lab where I test them. You have a low-end, low paid job at Dewalt and that doesn't make you an expert, you are not anywhere close to R&D and you are total noob in electronics. I'm saving this entire page in case it gets deleted and I will post it on candlepowerforums, rcgroups, endless-sphere and ridgid just to show them what a tool you are. Thank you, I haven't laughed like that in a long time.

PS: HEX code in the PIC. Ooooooooooooooo! 

Dude, just stop. I beg you.

[DEWALTDUDE]

APRELIA, DRC WARTEX, DRC-WARTEX, JOOMLA...... I'm not really sure why you started posting on here again? Seeing you on here has not been a refreshing memory. I think this forum can benefit from collaborative knowledge, not a fireball of bravado.

Madtec is simply saying, you are a self-proclaimed expert. You have no real documented history that proves your anything but a self-absorbed prick.

If you want people to listen to you, jamming information down their throat and talking down to people is not the best way. You catch more bee's with honey.... yadda yadda yaddaa....

Again, I think this forum can benefit from your knowledge and personal experience's if you could just get that information out in a appropriate, non-confrontational manner.

[Madtec]

First you glorify A123 and now your saying Sony is the best and the others are crap.  I think you need to do a little more research because you are clearly not suited for cell resource.  Oh and PS. Sony has a 3.0ah cell, but will it ever be suited for power tools?  Well, lets see if any primitive micro controller can handle that.[/color]

LMAO, it's like you read only half of my post and go on blabbering your own agenda. I said Sony phosphate is 2nd best after A123, meaning the cheapest "best" alternative to manganese/cobalt. You have no posted research whatsoever, and you call me out, lol!

Your post is just full of garbage and that shows, and there you again acting like you know something when clearly that is not the case, Phosphates are safer than oxides and are more expensive, oxides on the other hand can produce higher capacity but are more cost effective.  And as far as my agenda is concern, is to counter the flux of PooPoo that out coming out of your mouth.

so a 3.6v lithium cell can only discharge to a recommended 1.5v. 

AHAHAH, the lowest acceptable voltage for cobalt/Mn is 2.4-2.8v. At 1.5 your cell will be a total brick. You clearly demonstrated you are a charlatan and HAVE NO IDEA what you are talking about. Read this before you embarass yourself even more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium-ion_battery#Prolonging_battery_pack_life

Again, until you do cell level testing with discharge and overcharge cycles your still have no idea what you are talking about, just keep up with your copy and paste of various links

software and or hex/source code that is programmed into it

HEX code? BAHAHAHA!  It's like you are five years old and got ahold of your dad's electronics catalog. It's called "firmware", let me help you with that.

BTW the blog is all typed out by me, not copied from anywhere. Guys who are battery pros on RCgroups and endless-sphere linked to my page and copied my stuff because they found it useful.

Dude, just stop. I have a full blown lab where I test them. You have a low-end, low paid job at Dewalt and that doesn't make you an expert, you are not anywhere close to R&D and you are total noob in electronics. I'm saving this entire page in case it gets deleted and I will post it on candlepowerforums, rcgroups, endless-sphere and ridgid just to show them what a tool you are. Thank you, I haven't laughed like that in a long time.

PS: HEX code in the PIC. Ooooooooooooooo! 

Dude, just stop. I beg you.

Where did you get your lab, toys R us?  And now the copying and pasting begins, go ahead dumb Bum, i am done with you childish antics

[kjones]

I can't believe this guy just cited "wikipedia"!  enough said.  Anyawy, I'm done with this.