May 24, 2012, 03:22:22 AM

DeWALT Owners Group « DEWALT POWER TOOL DISCUSSIONS « POWER TOOL REVIEWS «  (Moderator: Gatorb888)TIA Review - DCD785 & DCD985
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: TIA Review - DCD785 & DCD985  (Read 2349 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Jr. Member
*
Karma: +6/-0
Posts: 70
Offline Offline
« on: December 15, 2011, 06:45:30 PM »

TIA did a review of these two drills. Overall not a bad review if you want to check it out:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/23aayTYJ3Bo&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;rel=0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/23aayTYJ3Bo&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;rel=0</a>


My only critique of this review is the stalling the drill out with a 3/4 spade bit.  I've used my DCD985 with 3/4 Auger bits without a problem in 1st gear. I've not tried my DCD785 but I've got no reason to doubt on speed 1 it would have any issue with a 3/4 Auger bit. They used high gear on both the DCD785 & DCD985 which is probably the reason the electronics intervined.

Anyway, if your interested check out the review. A few weeks ago they did the DCD980 & DCD780 (non-hammer versions) if you leaning in that direction.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/LSWM3pmawEY&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;rel=0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/LSWM3pmawEY&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;rel=0</a>
« Last Edit: December 15, 2011, 07:11:11 PM by anadevi » Logged
Full Member
**
Karma: +0/-0
Posts: 109
Offline Offline
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2011, 08:07:14 PM »

sorry, i found the reviews sloppy.
Logged
Jr. Member
*
Karma: +1/-2
Posts: 94
Offline Offline
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2011, 03:02:10 AM »

Same here, to me it looks like they have no or little experience with powertools.
Logged
Jr. Member
*
Karma: +6/-0
Posts: 70
Offline Offline
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2011, 05:20:08 PM »

These are pretty tipical reviews from TIA. I like their reviews as they come across as honest reviews - "Here's what I think".
Logged
Full Member
**
Karma: +0/-0
Posts: 109
Offline Offline
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2011, 09:56:32 PM »

i see what you are saying... i would have liked to see speeds one and two tested too... looked to me like they only tested speed 2 and 3.

thanks for sharing.
Logged
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Posts: 9
Offline Offline
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2011, 10:10:49 AM »

these guys are idiots, that was a rubbish review, they didn't do any tests on torque and when the drills started cutting out rather then being honest and saying they cut out too early, they started making excuses like the drill bits dull or they were pushing too hard. i dont care what anyone says but those drills should have been able to go through that timber with that spade bit extremely easily, even on the top gear (which by the way is the correct gear when using a spade bit)
Logged
Jr. Member
*
Karma: +6/-0
Posts: 70
Offline Offline
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2011, 12:54:02 PM »

I was testing a new drill I just got and at the same time did a couple of quick tests on the 785 & 985.

The DCD785 ran a 7/8 spade bit into a 2x4 OK. It however stalled using a  7/8 self feed  Auger bit.

The DCD985 ran both the 7/8 spade bit & 7/8 self feed auger easily though a 2x4.

these guys are idiots, that was a rubbish review, they didn't do any tests on torque and when the drills started cutting out rather then being honest and saying they cut out too early, they started making excuses like the drill bits dull or they were pushing too hard. i dont care what anyone says but those drills should have been able to go through that timber with that spade bit extremely easily, even on the top gear (which by the way is the correct gear when using a spade bit)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Cargo design by DzinerStudio | Edited by cartpauj Professional Web Design
Unique Hits: 1844012